The petitioner was liable for his have predicament. In the event the petitioner was dissatisfied Using the judgment during the go well with, he should have utilized the legal correct of charm instead of forfeiting that possibility and resorting into a belated application below Section 151, C. That are quite https://civillawyerindhakarachipa13679.dsiblogger.com/65117120/financial-settlements-lawyer-in-dha-karachi-pakistan-options